FREE Subscription

September 28, 2010

FREE Subscription         

Contents:

The Story of Vitamin B17 (Laetrile)

Coenzyme Q10

Cancer Success Story - Cortney Campbell

Healing Properties of Essiac Tea

Salmonella Outbreak & Food Pasteurization

The Story of Vitamin B17 (Laetrile)

In the 1940’s, Dr. Ernst T. Krebs, Sr. and his son (Dr. E.T. Krebs, Jr.) published a paper The Unitarian or Trophoblastic Thesis of Cancer, in the Medical Record, New York. In the following years, the father and son team investigated co-enzymes and the possibility that cancer results from a vitamin deficiency. In the early 1950’s, they theorized that cancer was caused by the lack of an essential food compound in modern-man’s diet, identified as part of the nitriloside family which is found in over 1200 edible plants. They learned of the kingdom of Hunza in the Himalayan Mountains of Northern Pakistan, who were said to be “cancer-free.”

Doctors Krebs knew that they ate huge quantities of apricots, but they did not believe that the fruit contained any cancer fighting substances ... until they learned that the Hunzakuts also eat the pits of the apricot seeds, which are rich in nitrilosides! Nitrilosides are especially prevalent in the seeds of apricots, peaches, apples, millet, bean sprouts, buckwheat, and other fruits and nuts, including bitter almonds. Dr. Krebs was able to extract certain glycosides from plants which contained nitrolosides, and eventually applied for a patent for the process of producing a metabolite form of these glycosides for clinical use. He named it “Laetrile.”

It took several years and actual clinical testing around the world before a model was proposed rationalizing the utility of Laetrile in the prevention as well as the treatment of cancer, when it received the name “Vitamin B17.” The Hunzakuts consume between 100-200 times more B17 in their diet than the average American, due mainly to eating the seeds of apricots and also lots of millet. Interestingly, there is no such thing as money in Hunza. A man’s wealth is measured by the number of apricot trees he owns. And the most coveted food is the pit of the apricot seed, one of the highest sources of B17 on earth. Visiting teams of doctors found the Hunzacuts to be cancer free. One of the first medical teams to study the Hunza was headed by world-renown British surgeon Dr. Robert McCarrison. Writing in the AMA Journal January 7, 1922, he reported: “The Hunza has no known incidence of cancer. They have an abundant crop of apricots. These they dry in the sun and use largely in their food.”

But why haven’t you heard of vitamin B17? It seems so simple! Well, the fact of the matter is that the Cancer Industry has suppressed this information and has even made it illegal to sell B17. The Medical Mafia has mounted highly successful “scare” campaigns based on the fact that vitamin B17 contains quantities of “deadly” cyanide. This is patently false. Studies show that vitamin B17 is harmless to healthy tissue.

Here’s why: each molecule of B17 contains one unit of hydrogen cyanide, one unit of benzaldehyde and two of glucose (sugar) tightly locked together. In order for the hydrogen cyanide to become dangerous it is first necessary to unlock the molecule to release it, a trick that can only be performed by an enzyme called beta-glucosidase, which is present all over the human body only in minute quantities, but in huge quantities at only one place: cancer cells.

Thus the hydrogen cyanide is unlocked only at the cancer site with drastic results, which become utterly devastating to the cancer cells since the benzaldehyde unit unlocks at the same time. The cancer cells get a double whammy of cyanide and benzaldeyhde! Benzaldehyde is a deadly poison in its own right, but when it teams up with cyanide, the result is a poison 100 times more deadly than either in isolation. The cancer cells are literally obliterated!

But what about danger to the rest of the body’s cells? Another enzyme, rhodanese, always present in far larger quantities than the unlocking enzyme beta-glucosidase in healthy tissues, has the ability to completely break down both cyanide and benzaldehyde into a thiocyanate (a harmless substance) and salicylate (a pain killer similar to aspirin). Interestingly, malignant cancer cells contain no rhodanese at all, leaving them completely at the mercy of the two deadly poisons. This whole process is known as selective toxicity, since only the cancer cells are specifically targeted and destroyed.

The hundreds of clinical studies conducted by many competent physicians around the world, including those directed by Dr. Emesto Contreras at the Oasis of Hope Hospital in Mexico, give us complete confidence that B17 therapy poses no threat to normal cells. This is bad news for the Cancer Industry. Apricot seeds are cheap…real cheap…not nearly as expensive as their latest chemotherapy drug cocktail.

My friend, Jason Vale, was handed a death sentence by his doctors in the mid 1990’s when it was discovered that he had terminal cancer. He learned, through extensive research, that people who once had cancer found healing properties in the seeds of apples and apricots, which as I mentioned above, contain large amounts of Vitamin B17.  

Jason immediately began to feel better by eating apple seeds and apricot seeds as a part of his daily diet. Within a short period of time, Jason’s cancer literally disappeared. When Extra aired Jason’s story on national TV in the mid-1990s, it turned out to be the program’s highest rated show to date so they chose to run that same episode the following week.

The viewer response was so great that Jason was inundated with telephone calls from people all over the country. Over the next few years, Jason literally helped thousands of folks successfully treat their cancer with apricot seeds.

The victim of an FDA Gestapo sting operation, Jason was sentenced on June 18, 2004, to sixty-three months in prison and three years of supervised release by a United States District Court in the Eastern District of New York. His crime? Selling apricot seeds on his website and telling people the TRUTH about their curative properties. Welcome to the land of the free and the home of the brave.”

After serving almost four years in prison, Jason was released from jail in early 2008. Jasons website is www.ApricotsfromGod.info.

Coenzyme Q10

Commonly know as coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), “ubiquinone” is a vitamin-like substance found in every cell in the body which is converted into a potent antioxidant (“ubiquinol”) and is vital to energy production. There’s no question that if you’re over 30 years old, you should be taking a good “ubiquinol” CoQ10 supplement each day, since the body’s production of CoQ10 diminishes with age as does the ability to convert it into ubiquinol.  

When you start taking the proper CoQ10 supplement in “ubiquinol” form, and in the right CoQ10 dosage, you’ll feel the difference right away in your energy and stamina. A good CoQ10 supplement fuels energy production in every single cell in your body by facilitating production of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) in the mitochondria. This improved energy output from CoQ10 therapy has proven to be quite valuable in treating neurologic disorders such as Parkinsons disease, multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Lou Gehrig’s disease), Alzheimers disease, Huntington’s disease, and strokes.

If you’re taking statin drugs, a good CoQ10 supplement is even more important because statin drugs deplete your body’s CoQ10 supplies. And without an adequate supply of CoQ10, your heart cannot function properly.

University of Texas professor and biochemist, Dr. Karl Folkers, encouraged a cardiologist, Dr. Peter H. Langsjoen, to use CoQ10 to treat congestive heart failure, with great success. According to Dr. Langsjoen, “The clinical experience with CoQ10 is nothing short of dramatic. It is reasonable to believe that the entire field of medicine should be reevaluated in light of this growing knowledge. We have only scratched the surface of the biomedical and clinical applications of CoQ10 and the associated fields of bioenergetics and free radical chemistry.(SOURCE)

In the 1970’s, Dr. Folkers followed the course of six cancer patients who were taking CoQ10 for congestive heart failure. Four of them had lung cancer and two had breast cancer.  All six experienced remissions of cancer due to CoQ10 therapy.  Folkers persuaded one of his financial backers, who had developed “terminal” small cell carconoma of the lung with widespread metastasis, to try CoQ10.  He was given less than a year to live by his oncologist. After one year of CoQ10 use, he had no sign of metastases, and he was still alive 15 years later!  The only therapy he received was CoQ10. Dr. Folkers, who died in 1998, recommended the use of 500 milligrams of CoQ10 daily in patients with malignancies.

In a study at the University of Scranton in Pennsylvania, scientists found that daily treatment with a topical CoQ10 lotion provided antioxidant protection to the skin of both young and middle-aged subjects. Interestingly, end stage AIDS has been associated with a significant deficiency in CoQ10.

Dr. Mercola has an excellent CoQ10 supplement for sale on his website (no I dont make any money from this - but I do personally take it every day).  One excellent way to improve the absorption of CoQ10 is to put the capsules in a cup of hot tea. And since fat also improves absorption, add a teaspoon of coconut oil to the tea.

Thanks to my good friend, Dr. Jim Howenstine, for much of this information on CoQ10. Please visit his website for some great articles on health and wellness.

Cancer Success Story - Cortney Campbell

In the Fall of 2004 I found a lump in my neck. Knowing that my mom's twin sister had Hodgkin's Lymphoma as a teenager, I was concerned. It was examined, MRI'd and then I was given the option for a biopsy. I was just out of college and was very intimidated by the cost of all of this medical care, so I opted to "wait" for a biopsy, was given antibiotics, and the lump shrunk...temporarily.

In September of 2008, almost 4 years after my initial discovery of my neck's enlarged "cervical" lymph node, I found a new lump- this time in my right armpit. I was calm and told my husband of barely 3 months, Kevin when I got home. About a week later, I was in the general practitioner's office. Within an hour I was getting lab work, then immediately sent to Piedmont Hospital here in Atlanta for a consultation with a surgeon who scheduled me for a full lumpectomy/ biopsy the next day! It took two weeks for the official results. The good news- it was a slow moving Hodgkin's Lymphoma with an excellent prognosis. "Nodular Lymphocyte Predominant Hodgkin's Lymphoma"- a mouth full! Bad news- the recommended treatment was 3 months (4 cycles) of R-CHOP chemotherapy and radiation. Side effects- hair loss, nausea, mouth sores, and the worst of all- INFERTILITY.

My first oncologist scheduled me for a PET scan to confirm the Stage II diagnosis, along with a bone marrow biopsy. Over the next few weeks I did both, and both came back confirming what Dr. M thought: Stage IIA. The lump in my neck is the original site of the cancer, spreading to my lymph node in my armpit. With lymphoma, cancer on opposite sides of the diaphragm is a Stage II diagnosis. While I was awaiting my impending doom of chemotherapy and mourning the loss of my future children, Kevin began researching alternative cancer treatment. Packages began arriving at our apartment from Amazon.com on a daily basis. Book after book after book began showing up. One of these was Bill Henderson’s “Cancer-Free: Your Guide to Non-Toxic Healing”. He told stories of people who cured their cancer naturally- without drugs or radiation. I really struggled with the idea of this. How could this “natural” treatment be so effective, but yet doctors continue to treat almost exclusively with chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery? It must be because modern American medicine was superior to simple diet changes and small town cancer cures, right? I read Bill’s book in one day and throughout the month of November began following his protocol 100%.

On November 4th I began a strict regimen of 2/3 cup organic cottage cheese and 6 tablespoons of flaxseed oil for breakfast every morning, a series of vitamins and supplements, and an immune “booster” made mainly from baker’s yeast called Beta Glucan. My diet was strictly raw vegetables and juices. I even limited fruit to 2 servings per day. No sugar, meat, caffeine, processed foods, or cooked food. December brought a new discovery- the Living Foods Institute here in Atlanta. I saw their ad in a newspaper at my Holistic MD's office. My husband and I both registered for the January 12 day course and detoxification. There I was introduced to new ways to enjoy raw foods. This helped me with the depression that comes with eating a diet of raw vegetables all day during a time of year when Americans feast and celebrate with so many sugary and rich foods. At the Living Foods Institute I received 7 colonics to detox my colon. I say I was in "perfect health" before my diagnosis, but the truth is my digestion was a mess! Something was just not right. I had a "Standard American Diet" of eating habits and my body was starving for nutrients! This is what I believe to be the main cause of my cancer. My body wasn't eliminating correctly and became TOXIC.

During this time we found out about Ty Bollinger’s book: “Cancer: Step Outside the Box”. In it we found reassurance that what we were doing was God’s plan for my healing. We also read more about the research and success of holistic approach to cancer treatment. After reading Ty's book, I began drinking Essiac tea as another weapon against the lymphoma. I believe it was this (Essiac Tea) that really detoxified my lymph system. We also bought an Alkaline Water Ionizer and all of the kitchen supplies we needed to prepare "Living" Foods. Living this lifestyle is a lot of work. I had never sprouted a thing in my life and now I was sprouting wheat grass. lentils, and mung beans and juicing wheat grass every morning!  I also began HcG Testing, a much cheaper and easy way to monitor the cancer. I began this in November and took a follow up in January right before the Living Foods Institute. I dropped almost an entire point in my score, excellent progress!

Also, exercise and detox was important. We bought a Cellerciser rebounder after learning about Kris Carr, author of "Crazy Sexy Cancer" from a fellow classmate at Living Foods Institute. It was after LFI that I saw and knew I was on the right track. It helped to be around other people who had a similar mind set as I did. In February 2009, after almost 4 month my days were starting to feel “normal”. During this process my husband, myself, and my doctors kept physical track of the cancerous lymph node in my neck. At the next oncologist's visit my doctor couldn't even find the lump. It had shrunk to the touch completely. I was scheduled to take my next HcG test in March.

But instead I found out I was pregnant. My husband and I didn't know what to think of this, but we knew the chance was there since I had gone off all prescription medication including birth control. What should have been a joyous event ended up being a scary one. I even had an OBGYN who refused to take me as a patient because “I refused to treat my cancer.” My parents and other friends and family were extremely skeptical of our decision from the beginning. The pregnancy only made it more difficult. It was during this time that any negative feedback from anyone had to be turned off in my head. I knew the importance of positive and prayerful thinking!

Through March and April we waited. I continued Bill’s protocol up until April when I started getting severe morning sickness. Anything green instantly induced vomiting. I knew I had to eat to nurture my baby, but the food that was fighting the cancer was not an option. The next few weeks I lived off almond butter, apples, and organic saltines. I also could no longer monitor the cancer through HcG testing since human fetuses have high levels of HcG.  This was an extremely scary time. Now, I found it ironic that shortly after I began surviving off of my 3 morning sickness staples, my oncologist gave us the shocking news that I was in REMISSION!

May 4th, 2009 I was declared in “clinical” remission and I have had a clean bill of health since then. My new oncologist did not think that that CT or PET scans were a superior way to monitor the cancer (which of course was fine with me!) so I received “clinical” status due to lack of symptoms and physical monitoring. I went on to have an unmedicated and natural birth to Ruby-Claire Campbell on November 19th 2009. She is truly a miracle! And so is her mom.

As of September, 2010 I am still in remission. I celebrate this, but alo don’t use it as an excuse to go back to my old ways. My diet had changed slightly, but I still stay completely away from sugar, processed foods, and conventional foods. I eat free-range meat or fish 2-3 times weekly. I eat a TON of organic vegetables: a big, colorful salad and 64 ounce veggie smoothie everyday. I still drink green tea and take 26 purposeful vitamin supplements a day. I have missed very few days of Cottage Cheese/Flaxseed Oil since I started.

I think there is a place for conventional medical treatment and intervention/monitoring. For me it was a PRAYERFUL decision to go the way I did. God gave us a fully functioning, self-healing body that when brought back to its original state can fight off malfunctioning cell growth like cancer. It will be a journey to keep the cancer away, not a destination. That is how America needs to look at health. I hope I can be an inspiration to encourage this belief. 

~ Cortney Worrell Campbell, age 26  cortneyw@gmail.com

Healing Properties of Essiac Tea

My grandmother, Helen Cade, “Mama Helen” as we all affectionately called her, was the church visitor for Castle Hills First Baptist Church in San Antonio for over 40 years. She and my mom had been two of the 18 charter members of the church way back in 1952. (The church now has over 10,000 members.) As the church visitor, Mama Helen’s job was to travel to hospitals and visit sick people … dying people … injured people. I remember traveling with her; and everywhere she went, to everyone she met, she would say, “Honey, do you know Jesus?” And then she would proceed to give them one of her “pet rocks” on which was painted “Jesus Loves You;” then she would tell them about Jesus’ death and resurrection and the Christian faith. What a woman she was! I can only guess that there are literally thousands of souls in heaven as a direct result of Mama Helen. 

Mama Helen was diagnosed with cancer in 1988. I’m not sure where she learned of it, but almost immediately she began to brew her own Essiac Tea. I remember going to her house in San Antonio and helping her make the tea, fill those amber bottles, and stick them in the fridge. She drank it faithfully, almost as faithfully as she shared the gospel with everyone she met. I say almost as faithfully, because I honestly don’t know of anything that she did more faithfully than share the gospel of Jesus Christ. Anyway, Mama Helen lived another 10 years with her terminal cancer, largely as a result of taking Essiac Tea, in my humble opinion.

Back in 1922, a Canadian nurse named Rene Caisse noticed some scar tissue on the breast of an elderly woman. The woman told her that doctors had diagnosed her with breast cancer years before. However, the woman didn’t want to risk surgery, nor did she have the money for it. Providentially, she had met an old Indian medicine man who told her that he could cure her cancer with an herbal tea. The woman proceeded to tell Caisse about the ingredients in the tea. About a year later, Caisse was walking beside a retired doctor who pointed to a common weed and stated, “Nurse Caisse, if people would use this weed there would be little or no cancer in the world.” This “weed” (sheep sorrel) was one of the four herbs in the medicine man’s formula, the other three being Turkish rhubarb root, slippery elm bark, and burdock root. The doctor had watched his horse cure itself of cancer by repeatedly grazing in a particular part of the pasture where sheep sorrel grew.

In 1924, Caisse wanted to test the tea on her aunt who had been diagnosed with terminal stomach cancer and was given less than six months to live. Caisse asked the physician, Dr. R. O. Fisher, for permission to try the tea on her aunt, and he consented. Her aunt drank the herbal tea daily for two months and recovered. Amazingly, she lived for 20 more years! Caisse also tested the tea on her mother who had been diagnosed with terminal liver cancer and had been given less than two months to live. Remarkably, her mother lived another 18 years!

Dr. Fisher and nurse Caisse immediately began treating cancer patients with the magic tea, which she eventually named “Essiac” (“Caisse” spelled backwards). She healed thousands of terminal cancer victims with Essiac in her clinic between the mid 1920’s and the late 1930’s. At the height of her involvement, Caisse saw up to 600 patients a week. The majority of those whom she treated came on referral with letters from their physicians certifying they had incurable or terminal forms of cancer and that they had been given up by the medical profession as untreatable. It was typical for Nurse Caisse to give her patients the Essiac treatment at no cost.

After word of her impressive results spread to the United States, a leading diagnostician in Chicago introduced Caisse to Dr. John Wolfer, director of the tumor clinic at Northwestern University Medical School. In 1937, Wolfer arranged for Caisse to treat 30 terminal cancer patients under the direction of five doctors. She commuted from Canada across the border to Chicago, carrying her bottles of freshly prepared herbal brew. After supervising 18 months of Essiac therapy, the Chicago doctors concluded that the herbal mixture “prolonged life, shrank tumors, and relieved pain.” So effective were her free treatments that in 1938 her supporters gathered 55,000 signatures for a petition to present to the Ontario legislature to make Essiac Tea an official cancer treatment. She fell three votes short.

Caisse was not aware of the vast influence of Big Pharma and Big Medicine, which were (and still are) more interested in making money than in helping people. Essiac was cheap and non-toxic. It could cut into the huge lucrative profits generated from the “Big 3.” Caisse constantly played cat and mouse with Canadian federal health officials. They demanded clinical tests, but she stubbornly refused to divulge her formula unless she got official assurance that Essiac would not be lost to the people who needed it, since her primary loyalty was to the people who had come to depend on her. The authorities couldn’t give her the assurance she needed; thus, she never divulged the formula.

Even the world’s largest cancer research center, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York, could not convince Caisse to divulge her formula. A steady stream of doctors visited her in Canada, observing case files and talking to patients, pressuring her to sell them the formula. She was offered huge sums of money to commercialize Essiac but refused all but minimal amounts of payment for her services. Not surprisingly, Caisse was heavily persecuted and continually threatened with arrest. Finally, fearing prosecution, she closed the clinic in 1942 and went into seclusion.

Rene Caisse died in 1978, at the age of ninety. Before she died, she signed over the rights to the Essiac formula to two parties: Resperin Corporation of Toronto, to test, manufacture and distribute it, and to a long-trusted friend, Dr. Charles Brusch of Cambridge, Massachusetts, Director of the prestigious Brusch Clinic and personal physician to former President John F. Kennedy. Dr. Brusch himself had cancer of the lower bowel, which completely disappeared after Essiac treatments. Brusch once stated “I know Essiac has curing potential. It can lessen the condition of the individual, control it, and it can cure it.”

Some of the best information on the internet concerning Essiac tea can be found at this website. I highly recommend that you visit their frequently asked questions page.

Salmonella Outbreak & Food Pasteurization

Im sure that over the past month, you have heard about the massive egg recall over potential salmonella poisoning. At the heart of this issue is the FDAs pasteurization agenda.  Did you know that the FDA recently made an announcement recommending that all grocery stores and restaurants begin stocking pasteurized eggs instead of raw ones.

One might ask, “But isnt pasteurization good? In order to better answer this question, let’s travel back in time to the 1850s and learn about the scientific “duel” of two Frenchmen – Louis Pasteur and Antoine Beauchamp. Both men had bacteriological theories of disease, but they disagreed about the origin and character of the bacteria. Little did they know that the winner of their duel would influence the course of medicine forever. Pasteur promoted what is referred to as the “germ theory” of disease. He hypothesized that disease arises from microbes outside the body (germs). He believed that each microbe has a constant shape and color and that each disease and illness was caused by a unique microbe which entered the body. His thesis was that disease can only be caused by microbes or bacteria that invade the body from the outside. Therefore, the only way to cure diseases is to kill the invader.

Beauchamp promoted what is referred to as the “cellular theory” of disease. He hypothesized that disease arises from microbes within the cells of the body. He hypothesized that microbes can go through diverse stages of growth and they can mutate into various growth forms within their life cycle. In other words, he believed that the microbes were pleomorphic, which means “many forms.” His theory was that when the host organism (i.e., person) became unbalanced and unable to maintain homeostasis, then these microbes would mutate and become pathogenic. In other words, it is the condition of the host organism is the primary cause of disease. Beauchamp called these organisms “microzymas,” meaning “small ferments.” Beauchamp believed that the bacteria, microbes, viruses, and fungi that were being blamed as the cause of disease, were actually part of God’s “clean-up crew,” breaking down sick tissue and ultimately decomposing a no-longer-occupied body.

Claude Bernard, another French scientist, entered into the debate with the theory that it was actually the environment that is the determining factor in disease. He agreed with Beauchamp in his belief that microbes do mutate, but Bernard asserted that these mutations are all a result of the environment to which they are exposed. Therefore, Bernard’s theory was that disease in the body is dependent upon the state of the
internal biological terrain. Pasteur went to great lengths to disprove Beauchamp and Bernard’s theory. Due largely to his wealth and political connections, he was able to convince the scientific community that his theory was correct, despite the fact that he had never been educated in science! However, on his deathbed, Pasteur admitted that his germ theory had flaws and that Bernard was correct, when he said, “Bernard was correct …The terrain is everything.” I think his pride prohibited him from admitting that Beauchamp was also correct, as he had been Pasteur’s nemesis for so long. However, it was too little, too late. The mainstream scientists had already embraced his monomorphic germ theory.

In the 150 years since the birth of Pasteur’s erroneous germ theory, it has become so widely accepted that it is seldom even discussed in conventional medical circles today. His theory was the genesis of modern allopathic (conventional) medicine, which claims that germs from an external source invade the body and are the first cause of infectious disease. The germ theory also gave birth to the technique of vaccination in 1796 by Edward Jenner, who took pus from the running sores of sick cows and injected it into the blood of his patients. Thus, the vile practice of vaccination and immunization was born.

So, back to the salmonella outbreak. According to the CDC, the number of salmonella cases has been steadily increasing throughout the summer. But in typical FDA fashion, the agency has decided to ignore the actual cause of the outbreak (i.e. filthy food production systems) and as I mentioned above, has called for all eggs to be pasteurized (i.e. cooked) before being sold. Its always amusing to see how quickly gullible Americans can be worked up into a frenzy by health authorities (I use that term loosely). We saw it in 2009 with the overhyped H1N1 (aka swine flu) scare, which fizzled out into nothingness. Now were getting a new round of fear-mongering about salmonella contaminated eggs.

Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, says it best, so here is his take on this fiasco: According to mainstream news sources, a massive 380-million-egg recall has been announced, and these eggs are all so incredibly dangerous that you have to immediately remove them from your refrigerator and take them back to the store where you bought them so that they can be properly destroyed. This is all backed up by phrases like,Its not worth the risk, and claims that if people eat the eggs, they are taking too much of a chance. Pretty scary, huh?

What theyre not telling you is that more than 80% of the chicken meat bought at grocery stores is consistently contaminated with the exact same salmonella. (LINK) A more recent study conducted by Consumers Union found that 2/3 of grocery store chickens are contaminated every day! (LINK) But you dont hear warnings to take your chicken back to the store! or it is unsafe to eat your chicken! Ever wonder why? Or to phrase the question another way, why is salmonella so dangerous on your eggs, but completely safe on your chicken? The answer is its not. Its the exact same risk in both cases: Cook either one and you destroy salmonella entirely. Infected eggs are no more dangerous than infected chicken, and infected chicken is apparently so safe that it's sold every single day at your neighborhood grocery store (without any warnings or alarms, I might add).

Salmonella contaminated chicken is apparently a non-issue. Now, heres the real reason why the issue of chicken contaminated with salmonella is almost never publicized: Because to expose the salmonella contamination of chicken would be to expose the sick, filthy and inhumane practices of the factory-farmed conventional chicken industry. And the (non-organic) chicken industry doesn't want anyone to start looking into its practices because its practices are just too disgusting for most people to stomach. You might lose your (chicken McNugget) lunch, and then youd probably stop buying chicken. They cant have that. So chicken meat gets a free pass: Its okay with the FDA, the CDC and the USDA that Americans are buying salmonella contamination every single day as long as its in the form of a piece of chicken flesh.

Why, then, are contaminated eggs being flagged as so dangerous? To answer that, you have to go back to a story I wrote in 2008 called, FDA Unleashes Mass Irradiation of Spinach, Lettuce and Other Vegetables. (LINK) There, following the FDAs demands that spinach and lettuce be irradiated, I explained the FDAs real agenda: Dont think the FDA will stop with spinach and lettuce, either. Theyre already talking about irradiating tomatoes, peppers and onions. Before long, radiation could become mandatory for ALL fresh produce...

Its already happened with almonds, which must now be fumigated or pasteurized in the United States -- a punitive rule that has severely damaged the U.S. almond industry. That took place after an outbreak of contamination with almonds. Similarly, this recent egg contamination fiasco is giving the FDA precisely the excuse it needs to demand routine pasteurization or irradiation of all eggs. Meanwhile, salmonella-contaminated chicken will be utterly ignored by the FDA even as it calls for the mass-pasteurization of dangerous eggs. The FDA, you see, will seize upon each contamination event as a leverage point from which to ratchet up its food sterilization agenda, and the agency wont stop until every scrap of fresh food sold at grocery stores is either pasteurized, fumigated or irradiated. Only then will the FDAs true agenda of food control be fully realized. (Insert evil genius laughter here.)

And this plan of course involves outlawing all raw milk, raw almonds, raw spinach, raw eggs and anything else that might be living. Hence the recent ramping up of criminal arrests and prosecutions against raw milk producers and living food coops. ... Dont think that this egg recall has anything to do with protecting the health of consumers. Cigarettes kill hundreds of thousands of people a year and theyre perfectly legal to sell. Even toxic chemical food ingredients like MSG, aspartame and sodium nitrite remain perfectly legal, too. If the FDA cared about protecting people from dangerous foods, it would have banned disease-causing ingredients long ago. But instead, the agency going after your raw milk, raw eggs, raw spinach and raw almonds. What does that tell you about the FDA's real intent?

Sources:

http://www.naturalnews.com/029538_FDA_egg_pasteurization.html

http://www.naturalnews.com/029539_salmonella_eggs.html

OK, enough for this time. But stay tuned. My next monthly newsletter will have some more great info!

And please REMEMBER: Cancer does NOT have to be a death sentence!

Thanks and God bless.


www.cancertruth.info

This newsletter is copyright of Ty M. Bollinger, Infinity 5102 Partners, and Cancertruth.info
© 2010 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Important Note: I am not a doctor. All content within this information letter is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech laws in all the civilized world. The information contained herein is for educational purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for the diagnosis, treatment, or advice of a qualified licensed professional. The facts presented on this website and in the book are offered as information only, not medical advice, and in no way should anyone consider that I am practicing medicine.  A conscious effort has been made to only present information that is both accurate and truthful. However, I assume no responsibility for inaccuracies in my source materials, nor do I assume responsibility for how this material is used. Any statements regarding alternative treatments for cancer have not been evaluated by the FDA.